What is one disadvantage of aluminum equipment compared to steel?

Aluminum equipment is known for being lightweight and having a high strength-to-weight ratio, which makes it a popular choice in rescue operations. However, one of the notable disadvantages of aluminum compared to steel is its poor abrasion resistance. When subjected to rough surfaces or significant wear and tear, aluminum equipment can become damaged more easily than steel equipment, which is generally more durable in these conditions. Steel is more resistant to abrasions, making it better suited for high-friction environments typical in rescue scenarios. This characteristic of aluminum can lead to quicker degradation and a need for more frequent replacements or repairs, which could hinder operational efficiency during critical rescue missions.

The other options do not accurately convey the comparative disadvantages between the two materials in this specific context. Higher cost is not typically associated with aluminum, as it is often less expensive than steel. Greater weight is contrary to aluminum’s advantages, as it is lighter. Better shock absorption is also a misleading attribute since steel typically performs better under shock loading, emphasizing additional strength and durability in high-impact situations.